Whether Petitioner has Article III standing to challenge conduct not within the precise subject matter of nationwide Federal police power enforcement

No question identified. : Questions fre sented 1. bid Prthoner have Article stonding Hs colle terally Mien AGB fekeral _ Criminal conviction, ASMg QE sl, $A2BSS,. relying on Pals Cour$!s “ . bedents, not sverruled, thet deaunstrate the CournmeryJacked Affale LE stending 10 cherge conduct net within the precise subj ech matter Sor nateennde Federal police Power ensvercemenr ? de bid the district court commit an abuse oh diseretian 1 Aor _ Addressing, much less reachitiig, the merdhs preseakd 1 the pifid andy AF Us Sil, $ RASS, Orid Sibi lysing the habeas Corpus Case. Where this Court's cose few, presenkd fy the despritt aurt, renders . the federal Conmitt ty fnyalid and denton strokes 2 idl tidy of Pett tiner's Subs ton file due process rlahds ? Se QS the Court of Ayzzeals ease p%s deseeetude yn So v0 bd jing He Const, tutional and Jurisdictional! clotms rates 1m the léstedch cour in Wubber-stempiiag on affivmance 43 the distriit cour¢ls des Missal jasked of remanding th wiztber ty phe histrich Cour ty Address and reach the merits, where the Cyyerameny AN steven receive Bny ovder fo answer the nuftian? 4, Wher remedy /s syolloble 1% this Court py righé phe wrongs tommuthd agaist hing by the Government te (raked the rights of AN finery encompassed 1 the Fedral lens A hebion, where this Courf!s precedents dnvalidoyve the fe heral eomlehvin, nl tuin fhe Prosecutiby agalnsy Petitisner, Ar lank wer Yh Curhls rose low precludes the boverumend from “ppl ying the emia) laws jy pais cose within the bourdorpec oF 2 Stok, Since to Artite IL court may 81% 1% Judgnunt thereundir when $1¥i Mn oat far tanduct commitied Py @ Shk, and ‘S$ one of lMporkence te the public ? . Table at Coutents Kage : Opinions Bela , / . Suwi'sd ieee 4 Consb-dutiona/ and Sfeta toy Prout sits Tavaleed a Etekment of the Case 3 Reasons fir Granfing He Pe bion . Lt, The Mito, Files, and Records of Me Case Conclusive ly Shaw that the folibioner /s LntHed WW Rela . Under 28 usiG FAAaSS iF . The Groutids Kalsed In The Febition Below & EL. Furisdicteda was lacking In The Bisbritt Court Below ? Li: The Government the bistac# Court the Court oF Aypecls, snd Oererse Counsel! Fat'ed ts Ftotet . Petitioner's Caustitetianal Rights BY | Concle $e30 30 Encler of Apyoendies