Whether the lower courts erred in denying the petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus to recuse a judge who engaged in wrongful, excessive, inappropriate and/or undeserved decisions/conduct

No question identified. : TRULINCS 67090509 THOMAS, DARRON Unit: PHL-F-S Chad June; Ashley Banks; Bradley K. Moss (Principal Judge); Daniel M Outlaw (Philadelphia commissioner of Police); Officer Samuels & Three (3) Unnamed Security Officers (Municipal Court of Philadelphia), & the U.S.A. C. List of All Proceedings: 3. The relevant proceedings are: : (a) EDPa Cases: i) Case 03683); ii) Case 21-416). (b) Ca3 Cases: i) In Re: DT -No: 21-2887; ii) In Re: Darron Thomas -Cases: 21-3072, 21-3076, 21-1367, 22-1386, 22-1367. D. Citations of Opinions and Orders of the EDPa and CA3: 4. The relevant orders are: in Case 03683 Aug 24, 2021; in Case 21-3072 &/or 21-3072 -Nov 16, 18, Dec 1, 15 -2021, Jan 6, 2022; in Case 21-1367 &/or 21-1386 -circa March 7, 2022 appointing Dennis Caglia (DC) as counsel. E. Concise Statement of Jurisdiction in SCOTUS: 5. SCOTUS has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC ss 1251, 1254 & 1651; F. Jurisdiction of the (Lower) Appellate Court: 6. The Ca3 had jursdiction pursuant to 28 USC ss 1292 & 1651, the EDPa had jurisdiction under 28 USC s 1331 & denied a petition for a PI and/or TRO and refused to disqualify a judge. G. Statutory Provision Authorizing SCOTUS Review on Certiorari: 7. SCOTUS Rules 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 29, 33, 34 & 39; & 28 USC s 1254 authorize review upon petition fo certiorari. The order(s) to be reviewed were made by the Ca3 on January 6, 2022 in Case No: 21-2887 and Case No: 21-3072. Both cases involve Darron Thomas. A common legal issue is the denial of a writ of mandamus wrt an EDPa judge's refusal to recuse himself. In Case 21-2887, one order denied a petition for mandamus wrt a refusal to disqualify a judge & the other order falsely claimed that the Ca3 did not have jurisdiction to review the ‘deferral’ of a request for a PI and/or TRO, when in fact the EDPa's order ‘denied’ the Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 65 motions for Pls and/or TROs. The EDPa orders were in Case: 03683 and Case 21416. As an attempt to “chill” the litigation in Case 03683, Darron Thomas (DT) was arrested without probable cause and probable cause, to this date, has still not been determined by a judicial officer in Case 21-416, despite a Franks heaing request cca Jan 4, 2022. This was to prevent DT from prosecutng Case 03683. This was in violation of SCOTUS' holding in Gerstein v Pugh & U.S. Const. Amend. 4. DT was also unlawflly arrested wthout a warrant for a claimed midemeanor offense. See items 1 (a)-1(g), 3(b)-3(c), 4-7, 9-12, 19-25 and 29-53 of Exhibit 404 -DT's EDPa sumission circa Mar 28, 2022. However, on January 6, 2022, the Ca3, the same panel as in Case 03683, refused to offer mandamus relief wrt a refusal of "Judge" Eduardo Robreno to recuse himself in Case 21-416. This is despite Robreno engaging in wrongful, excessive, inappropriate and/or undeserved decisions/conduct wrt DT -see items 1-29 of Exhibit 26 and items 1-23, 53-59, 77-81 of Exhbits 55 & 56 all in Case 21-416. This violated the extrajudcial exception, as set out in Liteky. H. Constitutional Provisions, Treaties, Ordinances and Regulations: 8. The Provisions involved are: (a) No Arrest Without Probable Cause, Privacy of Person, Unreasonable Search, Excessive Force (including sexual misconduct), and Possessory Interest Clauses of the U.S. Amend. 4;