QUESTION I
Whether or not a 46 year history, of a state court of last resort, through
judicial fiat, violating the due process rights of the Fourteenth Amendment, and
state constitution, through the acquiesces and complicity, of the other branches, in
creating, supervising, and protecting, an executive branch "court," in the arena of
workers' compensation, by unduly influencing the judicial pool, with financial
gain, while the members of said pool, were lawyers, constitutes a sufficient injury
to the integrity to the federal and state judicial system to warrant public interest.

QUESTION II
What are the standards or guidelines for applying the affirmative defense of
res judicata to both cases involving constitutional challenges and complaints for
declaratory judgement on constitutional challenges?

QUESTION HI
Whether or not a judge, may grant a motion for summary judgment, based
upon the affirmative defense, res judicata , when any of the fact elements, of
judicata , are challenged, in an action, demanding a jury trial?res

Whether a 46-year history of a state court violating due-process rights constitutes sufficient injury to the judicial system