Daniel Paul Starr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Environmental Securities
Whether the trial court erred in allowing the jury to convict the defendant on a lesser charge (misdemeanor) despite the indictment for a felony charge, and whether the judge's order for the jury to deliberate further on the verdict was lawful
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ], ON A STATE OISTALcT Court Level. 75 3+ Lawhul for Jury T Cender A verdech of gualt on A lesser<hatye(Masde Meaney), and The AfberHors the Judge otders the ‘jury *a deleber she on thes Vette & 122,125)? 2. ON A Stile. DEsmeeT CaUT Level. 25 £b Lawful Bethe Judge ty recerve a NoteProm the JY) and dis cuss My case wethquk bez present, anid later mMentzroved abst Unvanaudty (Te, a, 1%~24), Sees Eyer s Attaches , Tu0Ge) 3,55 zt Lawhd for fe + deleperabely Swatch Cou Reporter's Fecled ty ( 4 93s ¥ ' esbablesh Tete aa O15. B losy,, Bod, And Rule 2.4.(A)(8)0) Rules oF OKLakoma Court of Carmenal Argeats @cca) 5) Jury Notes 2 G Verdes 3) me wing OF He Wer uaaltty ‘ Tanperea werbh TYAN Sc tants ANd 4) He * Answerlte 1 18-24) Message ANd 4) © Jo°yEeeoll) Foren t cA Fale, ANA Were Nob Part of bhe vee, leer Ney ne ne eet Pee ty CON Struct roy of Appalant's ® . Peston AfPeat No. Foon 62 ¢ raf, Mhached ™ Summa 7 tledon Apert ay My tasunt! y _ 1 W203, Y te5ult', Wald Wave, Changed he COndete a, £. Ra MY case, COM plazh No, SCAND -aoi2-59 Gaaro of Bramenecs) ; 4. ON A STATE QWsragcp C ‘ Tu, , “AT Level 25 2} Avital for the Jirdge +p Poll the. Y ON AN Cqurttal wrth" n, " Burar’s and SB hab Bud © Btcenee , And Vida aly Polled Toardy) ; "9% Forced tha ducy To Rede lever abe lide] S) ON A ORsTALeT COUT Level ayy the Okiutlowa ¢. ue” Pen 306 Ian, foe 4 Ne Psy Set Mts No he VaGEG oc Ae T Combe Hye PA<e Swabs, Aud Hhen/ The Yaga Sucks and Male 4 <all thot tne ge A Complete Yody, ass Sway as le OWA SPE DEestegce CacgT Level ded They Wave Juesodectee|!