No. 21-7835
Michael Perryman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law due-process firearm-statute firearms legal-interpretation precedent precedential-reasoning sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the mere-possession reasoning in Bailey and Bousley retain precedential value in regard to 'use' of a firearm under the amended Section 924(c)(1)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the mere-possession reasoning in Bailey and Bousley retain precedential value in regard to "use" of a firearm under the amended Section 924(c) (1).
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2022)
Attorneys
Michael Perryman
Michael Perryman — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent