No. 21-7837
Cedric D. Burns v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-process buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process extension-of-time fifth-circuit judicial-procedure motion-for-rehearing standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the panel of the Fifth Circuit err by deciding the merit of an appeal not properly before the court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; 1) Did the panel of the Fifth Circuit err by deciding the merit of an appeal not properly before the court ; tc justify the denial of a certificate of appealability. 2) Has the Supreme Court of the United States overturned its own precedent in Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759(2017); Where the Supreme Court held that the Fifth Circuit . exceeded the limited scope of the COA analysis. : 3) Did the Fifth Circuit’ err by denying Mr. Burns first Request for an Extension of time to file his Motion , for Rehearing for 30 days. ; . i. oo.
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent