No. 21-7838

Leonardo Divinci Larck v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: communication-failure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel lapsed-plea-offer plea-bargaining plea-offer sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel require counsel to communicate a client's inquiry/response to a formal plea offer?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel require counsel to communicate a client’s inquiry/response to a formal plea offer? Does defense counsel provide ineffective assistance when he fails to communicate his client’s inquiry/response to a formal plea offer where that failure causes the offer to lapse?

Docket Entries

2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2022)

Attorneys

Leonardo Larck
Leonardo Divinci Larck — Petitioner
Leonardo Divinci Larck — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent