Whether Due Process Clause entitlement to trial by jury, oral argument and hearing were denied by overuse of Motion Practice to Dismiss

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . , 1. Plaintiff-Appellant questions whether Due Process Clause of the Constitution (Substantive Due Process) entitlement to trial by jury, the right to oral argument and hearing were denied systematically and unjustly by overuse Of (Procedure Due Process) using Motion Practice to Dismiss. Whether intermediate scrutiny is needed for Due Process of law. 2. Is the Due Process of law still accomplishing what it was intended to accomplish. . |