No. 21-7846

Jose L. Arroyo-Garcia v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2022-05-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure discrimination due-process equal-protection exceptions indictment-amendment legal-discrimination state-court state-courts
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-06-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Due Process Clause tolerate invidious discrimination by way of a state court's denial of a well-established exception to the rule?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED as Does the Due Process Clause tolerate invidious discrimination ; by way of a state court's denial of a well-established exception to the rule? , Is notice required when a state court converts a common-law matter into one governed by a stricter statutory demand? So Does the Constitution tolerate amendments to an indictment that broadens a criminal statute and makes a substantive change ~ in identity of the offense(s)? ( . , \

Docket Entries

2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-25
Waiver of right of respondent State of Ohio to respond filed.
2022-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2022)

Attorneys

Jose L. Arroyo-Garcia
Jose L. Arroyo-Garcia — Petitioner
Jose L. Arroyo-Garcia — Petitioner
State of Ohio
Seth Luxon GilbertFranklin County Prosecuting Attorney, Respondent
Seth Luxon GilbertFranklin County Prosecuting Attorney, Respondent