No. 21-7848

Martin Ibarra-Ozuna v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: collective-knowledge-doctrine constitutional-limits law-enforcement officer-request pretext-stops probable-cause reasonable-suspicion united-states-v-hensley vehicle-stop whiteley-v-warden
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-06-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When-officers-request-limited-action,-does-collective-knowledge-doctrine-allow-any-justified-action

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. — When officers who have probable cause for an arrest or vehicle stop request another officer to take only a particular, limited action, does the “collective knowledge doctrine,” recognized by this Court in Whiteley v. Warden, 401 U.S. 560 (1971), and United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221 (1985), permit the “requested officer” to take only the limited action requested, or does it permit the “requested officer” to take any action the requesting officers’ probable cause would have justified? B. — Can the collective knowledge doctrine be used to justify an arrest or vehicle stop for which there is probable cause when the actual request made is overly broad and unfocused? i

Docket Entries

2022-06-13
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
2022-05-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 13, 2022)

Attorneys

Martin Ibarra-Ozuna
Carlton Frederick Gunn — Petitioner
Carlton Frederick Gunn — Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent