No. 21-7849

Mark Stinson v. John P. Yates, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 5th-amendment administrative-segregation confinement-standards constitutional-law due-process fifth-amendment inmate-rights prison-administration
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What limits the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment places on the authority of prison administrators to remove inmates from the general prison population and confine them to a less desirable regimen for administrative reason?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. What limits the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment places on the authority of prison administrators to remove inmates from the general prison population and confine them to a less desirable regimen for administrative reason? 2. Whether the mere possibility of petitioner's rational argument of the law or facts in support of his claim is warranted, and whether the district court violated the Seventh amendment when the court dismissed this matter without having a jury trial as was demanded? 3. Whether there was a violation of the First and Eighth Amendment Rights violated? i %

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 13, 2022)

Attorneys

Mark Stinson
Mark Stinson — Petitioner
Mark Stinson — Petitioner