No. 21-7854

Michael G. Peters v. David Hittner, Judge

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-13
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination hearsay sixth-amendment unavailability
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause prohibits the admission of testimonial hearsay statements in a criminal trial when the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had no prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : | QGUESHINQ) LUE SEN F000 4 SOU0 76 LEIP DENT (fe AOMO Uh LS SIHOOYIES OL AA ASAEE St | Sip, 70 PLAT BY PLO CHWE OLA LEMS MICO! DEC CHa AUS fLEL7 ciple Clete § (PO Lfiel l tS, P 2. Syelto zegt fe PMI (oe GVO FE dai Bl Svbratgs Ol A SGC PTE Sibi ce Sujet), FAA crea (MEME Of Hie pb nreue fF iM be F007 Kw NUN ti Wubwgiyee [ILO OE Lifes, 6 LIP UNE ft CEC (LIES f 3. rots Sil fll POOUNT CL AUN OP 7O SALT OWSEE FFU ONC Lt LP kl aT ye ob rh Cop ub ge SELLS 2 “4 spat Fuk fl SOOT Of BUWUO ie. Ful Klolbbe, (LT FO Mt frst Fob Chih shh PLES yer Woe FO COLMA Li? ZL. COVIMAYUMF fot/ AAC HMUS JSP FO seu cin CK (ELOY MELE IASC A AO ANF f/f Zaxe Pll HALE Cty Fo HECY AE Cipla SOUS flL MAT F Ss Seoul Fi fob Tf OVIUENE fye SIV LEATO AY Jit fll F0CWE ah cope. ChvlaS ? 6 Wat tail Ol WG Page MASP AAF Oup plri nad: Mig. (UCC J CLUE NE, SAE CU-ECIS FF fleteCr FH FKP! Lb vbt{ttity fb 7 a2 MECH y FEEL Lit lt) OHCbe Vy Lgddai tll, MINE PV? 2 , | All MH SCIP Dh CNG AT STpofN4) bE la fue Sidnge FE fos ne belitto Cl BOCAS MC Fae Fitton, OF A OWL AE COE WE po) MES IM 7r0E oR COL, Zz. LET OF UR MES Ve perhig ere. (260 09 OST bes tecy Foles 77ST Z. foal Mfr o? , f2G. bet Of MO Stilig, FOE F7Z0° 4. LiL, | 47. opt. y at Sa Lh6io Jay fol Cow | J), @. LEY C/O/SE feces Toke Fear 4 fadeow * LOC 97 | | US. SeLher fs Lack Corl | f, GeK GILES , Jfevreeu, TELE 77 EER | zn | s: Gey Stille . ax~Ss Salt PULL (Gurl PG: 6 ¢ GUE 6. | Gu Grey Lobe fh x LCKe lipont ¥ Fonte (KC Aké; | Conlef bekoy feston, Fede | Celtite, Cli arya) (Vt-207) KALA, om Si 22ceo S FY Peter AT Ah flor Ys 20+ (U0dG6F Ve Ahi fPIIe JMELE SK (NTIYZS OSINID) S LMUWS , a SAUCE . ; to ow. € CONS 7 Jef) al Ghiio SIOTGC ES . fREOS(EUS Kalli) . . _ 7 /7 STATI 7 fF Ffe COU ~ = = 5 -B/ CEMES fl GEUISTH TE |K/7 ee 1 BORE — CGY CLUSION . , .. BY Zale K« eo Ve Mees : Oe foppta big 4a ZifLb Creel SMetrjien gpd BS Subbrs ltl Leck TZ . JOSE CF POTRYE eT SHO Ange Lestell ws. Sercria Zac, YYb OS 236 OY — Lé/ (82 foo SC (6/0 (GR) 2 FO; Libhen we Pidoise 929 US, WY IVY H SOA GIZ, 907 (770) _ . F8 Lterls ws feyen Fob, 3d /22/ CCO9 E973) 79° Brscy vs Gremey sro US, 899, 909, 1/7 SA 1793, 138 LAL 2S 97 C1997) “A Wikkrow ys. Lerkin y2l US 25, Yb, 95 SICK /YSEC, FB L. 4b. 2d (1970) Co Wiffres yz) us. ef 97,95 8 CA I9S6 ~~ + // Leolerdl v3 Hhle G82 F 2/4 53/ C22 Cat Chis) . . . SS Behe us. Gomez Wok FLA S56, S97 (FYB Cir. /972). SL Unbel Sheba vs Chef Per, 523 U5. 323, 3°%, Wt SLL fob), (yo bled 2b 9/3 92%). 3 ese Zampser + Lvisvi[iz, 362 US 179 & Od 2S OSY, 8 SLL 62Y, T° MER 24S I 35S. Set fll oo ove Za re Wash p 197 US. e597 es LAd | ; 368,970 5 G4 068 sy Shs Gt 2S 322. Cl ssegle/ A Sor fa reoc eld g

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-06-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 13, 2022)

Attorneys

Michael G. Peters
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner