Whether the decision of the Arizona Supreme Court prevents application of the Confrontation, Due Process and Compulsory Process Clauses of the US Constitution, requiring the state to give a criminal defendant the opportunity to inspect and test the source code of the results from which the state intends to use against him at trial

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . STEVEN GUARDADO FILED AN APPLICATION FORA WRIT OF MANDAMUS WW THE ; . w é LAL COURe , SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA REQUESTING AN ORDER TD THE SHHE TRI we TO COMPLY WIT FEDERAL CONSTI UTIONAL PLOVEKONS, INCLODING 7 . oge . < nx | HE QUARANTEES OF Tie CONFRONTATION, COMPULEERY PROCES , AND Ove PREGES. CAGES, AS INTERPRETED By CHER STATE COURS OF LASS RESET, AND US DISTRI aya. THE ARIZONA SUPREME COURS DISMISSED THA APPLICATION FOR MBNDANUS, ReRUStalG TO CONSIDER THE MATTER, THEREBY DeRINNG AN UMOECAN T FEDERAL QUESTION THAT ' WAS NOT, BUT SAUL Be, Séxriep Boy THES Comer. : THUS, THIS CASE PRESENTS THE FOLLOWING Quesnons : . T, WHEMiER THE DECISION OF THE ARIZOWA SUPREME CoMer PRENENIS APPLICATION OF THE CONFRON TATIOS , DU : PRESS ARID COMPULSORY MocEss CLAUSES of THE : . US CONSTTTUTION, REQUIRING THE STATE TO Give A : : ; CRIMINGL DEEN DAG TF THE GPPORUNI ty TO INsReT , AND TES? THE =0URCE CONe » THE RESULTS. Flom waicd ; : THE STATE. iWrENOS TO USE AGAINGD fim Ar TAL. T.Wiknen TE Azo SUPREME Covet FARED TO . a APPiy THE DUE Pca CLABE Of tHE FEVATEEN CH : AMENDMIERIT, TH WHEMAER THE ARIZONA SUREME Cover FAILED TO : REQUIRE THE stark. ro FOLLOW siaTE AND FEDERAL STAIUTES FOR COM PEESION ATE ReLepce : . . or ELneeiy Of MEDiCaLLy VULNER AEE WiMaAres, DURING A RANDEMC.