Whether the statute of limitations on a legal malpractice claim can begin before any cognizable damages occur

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether my right to sue was violated in New Mexico under the 14th amend., and § 1981, after a state court denied my right to sue, when it decided to toll] the statute of limitations at the time of the negligent acts, and not at the time of the “discovery” of the negligent acts, which was in direct conflict with the Court’s own holdings’, and the California holding that the New Mexico law was based from? (2) Whether the statute of limitations on a legal malpractice claim, in any state, can begin before any cognizable damages occur, and whether the client/myself can be reasonably expected to know the facts of my attorney’s negligence, prior to being injured when I obtained the training manual that made my claim have merit? (3) Whether the New Mexico Court violated my civil rights under the 14th amend., and § 1981, when the court decided that both the discovery of the facts, and the injury on my malpractice claim, could not reasonably be argued as a fact issue for a jury, and decided on this issue as a matter of law, and dismissed my case? T_T ae