whether-the-court-has-misinterpreted-an-ex-post-facto-violation-within-the-context-of-parole

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. the the sO” Ceseutd been ausherered by Ie Court % change fhe oiterprefation and application oF an ex post fede vwolifion wither . the coifed of parol. by Lie, such violakten fo skkudeny changes such ag in inchtal parole. leg SSy, bit now to exclude the ~ pacfices anc rules usek by the fable egeny fo adually determine 7 parole although those pract des rules have gn Steady incFeased : — pdittoner's texatams cncatcenifien wher they were RMroadivdy opplad to him as compated_fe Ss paddces tn effet ch fhe Fine oF pdkftcneS ot creme and sevfenctog. a . a. tes the Gut rodeFenech cfs Copa renen or Filta. a Comphit uncle the. FRCP, and eSyeakeydy FeNePsed the cache oF ereeo¥ regeatteck fe ovetconte. a dSeyae unde FRR ADO suc fhe i @. placbisf Qo longer hes an assunsften oF comedfness ue hés | Fathi allegedions , arch Oa Congas muss ecfivdy become a Sammaty jedamenf raion in Ss défads. ;