Whether the Supreme Court of Nevada erred when it concluded that the petitioner was not prejudiced by cumulative error after the district court abandoned its initial indictment and the petitioner was reindicted

No question identified. : , 08 sc Cacsened For %. | Q) Mee re Spree Cok x Nevodo Peveveed Whe | petitioner's conickion on Coudy Yin C28-293024-1, Aid Bre Coat’ B Orde Cemandkine Vee pebtioney Ys re ‘ reoerrenced" Yo ww atv a iy ona nolly a Pea \n indiclinentt ; Wrst oe Awnond mens Rive Six, and seen 2 . a eously Yat re. Eig Oud Tete Didvier Coot ad | not ety & bi Vo The gettionee? oan doned is yew Ag, and Yhot the " adoomdoned | pr ction” aS we Ce oe. | @B) Did Ye Sopverne. Crotty x Nevade ary when it tonchided Yeo he gettionee WOKS nov prey cx | by combative pose aller YL mis onli? ii @ .. Te WE Caeccepn ie Erno Eviyo Kaenas, ED voti994. Rh bave Kin Desert Gade Prison NenNewse “Andion wag, Nevodo aot Pes Se CeAresentOdion Qe Pes ene AtXerney General haven ). Ford KYtorney Rar The Stoke & Nevada \0b Nos Carson Skreet @. of Contents. @ ConTaNs PAGE BvERIONS TARE Co, AEWEN VA PANE Ws We Paoceniius iu IME, GF KSTROANIES Mow CAyAVord oF GANONS NM CAPEL W CASE 1 SUASPICTON AL STATEMENT 2 ConstrTOTION, Fonsnons ky? STARNES WWNOLNED guy STRIEMENT af TE Cyse ty EXISTENCE CE Dusan Berow GS RENSONS FoR GANTING Tie WAT G12 Ke We Suftane Comet of Navas hs DeQvay MULTIPLE FEPeAAL GUSSHIGNS IND DRECT | ComPLact with WHE MAAGBLE DECASIONS OF THS Cou] | KAGOWETS NMAYALING BERSONS Fr \aneey \3 T. Te Satan Gout of NEVADA GAAGD Wal — 13-15 AT Fema THE feTONed TS BE “ACSENTEC! WTIOTT NGS WAL TS A Cound TARY VS Feversep BEUNSE oF An ABURE OR WE DSACT COATS piseLETion TW. We Satteme Cosel of NEVA Corscrusyorl 18-33 TAY WG Eth SIMOAL DTACT CoAT ny Noy GAA Wh CinG TY The fenroweae VoLonTVAILY ROADONSD WS latt Win Ro| ViaK lhe SHSED od AN UNAS ABLES DETAAManta o& AS... WV Qu: oF Cones Cort CPATENTS | PGES) TEL Wwe Suttame Conf of NEWS Con 353% CID TAN TOE RSTVSNOA WihS 3 CASHIN BY ComdLAfwe PPoseaor AN WMSUNPUTY \S ERY oNGouS Contiyarond . 3t-34 Proof of SQance 24-4 MEK To Pe Tow AMS NO ; TIS PANIC, | PACKS) Dicyre a tinted Sekes , STO 0d 44, \ol 5.0% 2S, | IG LG 2d 314 (2or8) lo, 13 | heprend v New Jersey 1329 Ud 4b6,1205.Ch 2246, lVtL.td Al 435 (vo02) 10, 1S, 3t Neizonay Conk, SSL Uo 932,534 (2009) ILAG Barcon v Stele, 10S Nev. 107) 756,753 £2) 440,4s2 Qasa) 33 ig lad Spb Ney. 113,092 F.2d 123%; 1289 Cass) \t CMuiell v Missrnsiags AI. US 320) 329, oS S. Ck 2633, . | 16%A Slo L.Ed 24 28,234 Crags) (2,36 Coxcall v Uniled Slates, 2640S 132, 4S 80h 1265, | : 64 L, El 543, Th 3686 (92a) 113i Chomberss v Missizsi9o} , Ato us 254 O92) 3% Chive) y Calitaroian, 29 us 72,7623, 94 5.Ch 2034 4089-23 LEd & C8§ (isG9) ue Davis v Mola, 135 Ch AS29819 L, G.2) 12,18, 20 32% (aos) 33 Elkins vUnibed Steles 264 Ub 2b, 0 5.0 1434 (neo)425/32 Ex gotte Jae ¥ eon Me 08 PABA 24 Lcd Bt BTS va Rial eiown pl iF US 344, l06 5.Ch BaG,q) L.Ed. | “Ad 338 (1aze) 12,38 Gordone)\s v Onited Shires , 354 US 4569, HKG 28,32 Haines v Kemer, 404 US 514,42 $.Ch S94, 302, ' “Ed. Zl CS2 2 Harris v Reel WWI US 265,260, 194 $. Ch 103K, 1042, 103 Lid 2d 405, 318 (a1) F | \\ @ @ WNIMOK OC ASTHIAITES corrh PRAWLANNGS PGE (S) Wlincs Y Codes 7 OU Kata v United Shoes, 334 0S 344,14 L.Ed 2d 54, 124 $0 8,Ch SoF lee v Keanna, 24 US 362,122 5. Ch. BFA 181.1, Ed 2 $20 (2002) \F Lewis United Shes ,B8S US 256, 25 )IFL.ed 24 212, 31S, 37 SChY2y 29 Lockyer v Mndode 526 U5 3,73,1235. Ch nee, WB, ISdLEd 2d 144, 156 (2008) IG Mller-Elv Dre ke S45 us 231 ,20-66, 128 seh 234, 2828-40162 L.Ed 4 1b, 214-39 (2008) 32. NR AOW itahash 3 $.Co, 340 UD 495, 7H S.Ck 483, 451 6d 479, 24, mn (nh) 232,14 Ley | Coo.cct) NG6192 (1981) IS Nevedev Noyd 124 Nex. bly, Rep Pre to, 212 0.4d ACHAT (203) 3t O'Neal v Me Aninch , S'3 0S 432,436, IIS 5-0. 92,494 130 L.Ed. 24 U4, 20H) IS Parle Vv Boane\s ) Sos Rd 422 IZ}, Cry, 2065) 35 feople v lolly sOH Cols EN 952, (026 fp \o2#, 252, Pal IB, yova ea)" 3S Preston v Uniked Siehes, 2H us 364, 267, WV L.Ed, 2A, TFL Ay 3H Sh EC) \26 Rise vUnikssl Soho , 364 ud 283, Leh 20 685,40 8.0 Vit {9 of Apacs emis e DIWASPRIDENCE, CES (Brow Pies) ‘4a, Wane Skiane v Kors any Executives Assn , BA v