No. 21-7902

Marc Anthony Lowell Endsley v. California

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-18
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion legal-remedy procedural-bar standing vexatious-litigant writ-denial
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a vexatious-litigant-order be used to deny a writ-of-habeas-corpus?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Can a vexatious litigant order be used to deny a writ of habeas corpus? ii.

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2022)

Attorneys

Marc A. Endsley
Marc Anthony Lowell Endsley — Petitioner
Marc Anthony Lowell Endsley — Petitioner