Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' use of a new non-retroactivity doctrine to deny Petitioner's subject-matter jurisdiction claim is valid as an Ex post Facto law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether Dilahona Court of. Crimiaa| Appeals use-oF anew non-retroactivity doctrine ta deny Petitioners Subgectmatter jurisdiction clai mis bavalid | AS an Ex fost Facto law withiathe meaning of Art. L Soe. 19 of the Constitution, — | a. Whether Olahoma Court of Criminal Appeal’s use of State oy ref MatlotF v, Wallace, 497 P.3d b86 oat anca al te deny Petitioner: + t w a js . if Subasectmatter gurisdiction claim is & ful; Ag that conflicts with decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Citewit and United States Supteme Court, | |