Whether Thin Court Will Cobh, Hat 2 Mant Peet injudiiee. has heen Crrtumven%e d by The lower Courts and Also been diste garde d by The Appellate | Courts

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1). Whether Thin Court Will Cobh, Hat 2 Mant Peet injudiiee. has heen Crrtumven%e d by The lower Courts and Also been diste garde d by The Appellate | Courts of This Courlrulings On Sawetural Brrr deboct” From An ineinal Kahro Paieg hens edlied in the Custodial Comme lita bane’ Corlnary Yop the original Charger hd! Const hited A Poti af . Mud On The. “Gun” ty~ lot: deadly Weapon, cloeumentid Cusbrd'el Criminal be cords fn 4iVeAR And Counting. flurdudect tp Rule. /9 (4), Which needs tp he Cort'Riad te Comeoc? He myudtioe under Intorna/ Shuchuns/e nso’ Which allowed the Balve Publioitses, ote... sand 4, Mahelovs C entravensy. See AIWI.C. SIAS4 (2), This dohect Ratu Groat Buble hnpsittnde « iE ACoA! Tublie Hap iHidnde, a). Because the E loveuth, Crreuit Court pF Appeal, has Overloaked A tre. Manitost rnjusheo” That Apparent On The. Poor bh The. record, Whar} he dn dire Tt and EXphens Conhheyt UMA Tht, Corertn held, las Ke Olano, SO7U.8. TAS, 738, 112 S.C 7D, 1365, 13 L.Fd. 4d 508 (1993) holding, “The Court labeled th Cskgory of Crhehs As " Seuctunal > Seealvo, LAvizonay, Kbmanate, AN U.S. AT% 30 IN S.CH 10s 12S, 119 L.Ed. ad30ai79)): Citing Stale V. Burton, 3/4 90. del 136, I24(19 75) J: lel. at 1309, Which Loa dheck CeMet lhl wees Cobh aber. ) ) Questians | Conbrwah'on 2). Me Caurl has Allowed A Challenge to The hecond on hold An exAM An of Any Beate Matod In The hovibus pet tons Red by habeas C armas . Vat: Ey As For Such, Charly have denied | peli honer due procens ah laws “awe The equal profecin Theres F: Contaty te C onchtuljonal prowinrony. 4 Thur, Ar hore han ever heen Any evidentiary Findings th orthary to the Mahed Bache dirth,sing the ‘“dictohs oh Ke ent tar” Salve 14 esto”: Hy Claim Re mains | MovMortouar On na ksee Don Conrochrees. . Thy Court Hold « Sy, A Saecdanal error in 4 Crane] proceeding or trial Always heguires revernal ob A Lomwielior, or Claianed error dehoat of Such, because Such error hendehs the Trial An unreliable Vehicle Aor the clelervnashber of guilt L Rove v. Clark, 478 U.9. $70, 577-93, Ibe OCF 3101s 3105-00, 92 L kd. dd 4600986) 1; 4/0, a Governmental, Mise ont ai ch Ue hoe ene a oF 4 De Addnl hegur he div of Prin'nal Dh angun'l Andoune V, Blob, § 4 oie 3, 14 a (aaNi CUS. v, Russell i ud. 423, 431-24 OF 1037 3 L. Fel. IdPoe 1973) A: li, ° to be im Conkier hone bon 43 melted and revilore Galt |