No. 21-7922
Jason Michael Ehret v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea habeas-corpus judicial-bias rule-11 standing structural-error uncounseled-counsel void-conviction
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does an uncounseled guilty plea constitute a structural error that can be raised at any time?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | L. Does an uncounseled guilty plea -where defense counsel was suspended and thus : “ineligible to practice in federal court" at that time -constitute a "structural error" which can be | raised at any time because the resulting conviction is void? I. Did the Southern District of Texas show actual or apparent judicial bias when during Petitioner's Rule 11 plea colloquy he explicitly stated he did NOT understand his rights under FRCrimP 11(b)(1)(C.E) -and the district judge simply ignored his response and entered his now unknowing guilty plea? ii
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-01
Petitioner complied with order of June 21, 2022.
2022-06-21
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 12, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Jason M. Ehret
Jason Michael Ehret — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent