Whether the plaintiffs' claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of their constitutional rights were improperly dismissed

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \: , N ) Why Ga Adhten Roimguer < Zarwary Smirk oF He Palestine. Ratice Bepa. A+ Onder Color oF Sie WW, bvstem ) or \$ ASC SubseeAS QnoYer fo We deprivation of any MOhes Pri vienes or Immo Kher seeured by fle Fekeral Consqyuten . 7 , a» Pinatahe Fx Vd 0 Tecrmls To THE RePser. oc do. TRE Coury (eVLews TVE OS DECT Hong Ty THE EePOeT Noc.r0, WHY MEN ThE Comer REVEEW) THE 0B TELTINY To Poetreny OOF BR Mabrsteare Sunes MemeT de nave Awl, Ae ZA) A. FL Ce vrEey) D . 3\ WHY Wh THE Sm cl\ecvit+ COvET of APPRLS Nene my peo, STaTtne THeT PlwTtFes Appeal Lerner wasn T Mx FSR Tey # : A Suton : STV plant y MSONT XOAWS Ter Ar SHAT Teme | 2 TF WAS Teer Got erred Awd 5s LEMITE TS hele sy . Ben TO MASLIN HES gun mosl +E Plaseres CAA re So $0 mon ees Teer PssrTeon NUE To THE PAnhE mec. TS betub on ThE razr Some T Free Net. | .