Lamar Reese v. Richard Bowen, Warden
Whether the failure to object to the admission of a polygraph examination that contained obvious errors deprived the defendant of a fair trial
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; x stipulated intaa polygraph Test. But-the po raph resutts showed Obvieus error ane. did not Comply Uwith Ohio evidence Rule Uh ). But there was no obsection to jtat trial. XZ missed tt and my Attorney Missed it, Also xX have evidence that X have ADHD diagnoses since’ X wasakid, If Someone miss o. erfor does that make @ error rightoves ? xf Someone dont get caught stealing does that make t rightovesl . Also x presented the error en Direct Appeal os plain error and sent a Copy to the trial court, X taught it all the way to the Federal court. My cight to @ Fair Trial fs a Constitutional right ? . This polygraph Test shaved obvious error. The polygraph examiners asked mean Zacttizéen of Canada and X suid yes, bet thz answéF was Found non deceptive. But . itis obvious Lama citizen of U.S.#. is this achvious error? The Jury was Mislead. Is this nota fair Trial? | | : ; |