No. 21-7930
Daniel Coleman v. Minneapolis Public Schools
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. This case-presents the very simple question of whether trial courts have Jurisdiction or under their inherent authority, to grant relief from a voluntary dismissal in which there have been allegations of fraud on the court?
2. What effect does Fraud have on a case?
3. IS A MOTION FOR RULE 59 TIMELY IF THE DOCUMENT IS DELIVERED ON THE FINAL DAY (after hours) or ON A WEEKEND AND DOESNT GET SCANNED BY THE COURTS UNTIL 2 BUSINESS DAYS LATER?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trial courts have jurisdiction or inherent authority to grant relief from a voluntary dismissal in which there have been allegations of fraud on the court?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-31
Waiver of right of respondent Minneapolis Public Schools to respond filed.
2022-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Daniel Coleman
Daniel Coleman — Petitioner
Minneapolis Public Schools
Jonathan P. Norrie — Bassford Remele, PA, Respondent