Daniel Coleman v. Minneapolis Public Schools
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether trial courts have jurisdiction or inherent authority to grant relief from a voluntary dismissal in which there have been allegations of fraud on the court?
No question identified. : : JURISDICTION , The United States Constitution provides jurisdiction pursuant to Article Ill Section 2: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, inLaw and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority. Jurisdiction is also conferred pursuant to 28 U.S. 1254 (1): Cases in the courts of appeals may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by the following methods: (1) By writ of certiorari upon the Lo petition of any party to any civil or criminal Case, before or after rendition of judgment or decree. CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED . MN Statutes ( Minn. Stat. § 518.58 (2012) | 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(25) | (Minnesota Statutes, section 121A.05) | ( MN Stat 179A.06) Individual with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, | and the Family Educational and Privacy Rights Act). (Minn. Stat. 121A.05 &121A.06:Reports of Dangerous Weapons incidents in Schools) : __QUESTIONS ; 1. This case-presents the very simple question of whether trial courts have | Jurisdiction or under their inherent authority, to grant relief frorn a voluntary dismissal in which there have been allegations of fraud on the court?