No. 21-7932
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process florida-constitution judicial-jurisdiction jurisdiction mandate trial-court-authority
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter an order reinstating the previous order vacating offense under double jeopardy principle despite mandate from DCA
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Question One: WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT WAS WITHOUT | JURISDICTION TO ENTER AN ORDER REINSTATING THE PREVIOUS ORDER VACATING OFFENSE UNDER DOUBLE JEOPARDY PRINCIPLE DESPITE MANDATE FROM DCA; WHERE THE STATE DID NOT APPEAL THE INITIAL ORDER VACATING , THE OFFENCE AND THE JUDICIAL LABOR HAS COME TO AN END; THUS VIOLATING APPELLANT’S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITES STATES CONSTITUTION AND ARTICLE 1, | SECTION 9, OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION. 2 ; Pe
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2022)