No. 21-7943

Anthony Gerald Wernsman v. Colorado

Lower Court: Colorado
Docketed: 2022-05-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: colorado-courts confrontation-clause confrontation-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process harmless-error self-incrimination witness-intoxication
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-confrontation-rights-were-violated

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE COLORADO COURTS WRONGLY CONCLUDED THAT A DENIAL OF CROSS-EXAMINATION ON WITNESSES INTOXICATION DID NOT IMPLICATE PETITIONER'S CONFRONTATION RIGHTS? ‘ 2. WHETHER A PARTY CAN REQUIRE A WITNESS TO INVOKE THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION IN FRONT OF THE JURY ON CROSS-EXAMINATION 3. WHETHER THE COLORADO COURTS WRONGLY CONCLUDED THAT , ANY ERROR WAS HARMLESS |

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 22, 2022)

Attorneys

Anthony Gerald Wernsman
Anthony Gerald Wernsman — Petitioner
Anthony Gerald Wernsman — Petitioner