No. 21-7943
Anthony Gerald Wernsman v. Colorado
IFP
Tags: colorado-courts confrontation-clause confrontation-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process harmless-error self-incrimination witness-intoxication
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-confrontation-rights-were-violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE COLORADO COURTS WRONGLY CONCLUDED THAT A DENIAL OF CROSS-EXAMINATION ON WITNESSES INTOXICATION DID NOT IMPLICATE PETITIONER'S CONFRONTATION RIGHTS? ‘ 2. WHETHER A PARTY CAN REQUIRE A WITNESS TO INVOKE THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION IN FRONT OF THE JURY ON CROSS-EXAMINATION 3. WHETHER THE COLORADO COURTS WRONGLY CONCLUDED THAT , ANY ERROR WAS HARMLESS |
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 22, 2022)