No. 21-7950
Enrique Alejandro Faz v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment burden-of-proof constitutional-responsibility drug-conversation drug-evidence due-process evidence-discovery government-agent probable-cause warrantless-search
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it is unconstitutional to derive from an alleged phone call that the conversation is about drugs simply because an agent of the government says so or is there a burden of proof that must be met
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether it is unconstitutional to derive from an alleged phone . call that the conversation is about drugs simply because an ag“ent of the government ‘says so or is there a burden of proof that , must be met, and : . Whether a person can be held constitutionally responsible for “evidence found at a business establishment where he was doing re| | pairs at... : coe vee ce be : | a a an
Docket Entries
2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 23, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent