Whether the United States District Court Northern District of Indiana South Bend Division's judge abused his discretion in dismissing the petitioner's habeas corpus petition

ESTION) PRESENTED b, Whether the Unibed States Districh Court Northern Nigtrick of Tadiana South Bend Bivision’s “Judge: Robert L, Miller, de,” ercoc in hig decision making’, As So when denying the Petitlonee his foie rights bean Hebeas Locpus proceeding,, By diomissing the Pelbioner habeas Corpus pebibion (ECF 4) because ibis untimely... a). Whether the United Skates Districk Court Northern Bisteick of Tadiana South Bend Division's ~ Judge’ Robert L. Miller, de,” abused his discrebion as to disregarding the Pelibioner’s Sresk, Second, and Seventh ground, the Supporking Facts within She Pek -toner’s Pelikion under 28 U.S.C. 8 Aa54 for Weik of Habeas Corpus and the atkached exhibits in Soppock of Said grounds) and Vneie sopporting Sacks?, That in Gack proves that The Peliioner shall be entitled bo habeas Corpus relieve ), State of Tndiana a. Ron Neal, Warden RELATED CASES. | | dD. State of Ladiana v. Antonio McCaster, Cause: No. 19h02-1302-FA-2 | D. Matonio McCaster v. State of Tadiana, Cause Wo. TTKOYJBI ~ CRB44 . : 3). Anbenio MeCaster v. State of Tadiana, Cause No, Mo2-1503-Pc-3 | d.Mabonio MeCaster v. State of Tadiana, Cause No. 74K02-1605~PC-DINO 5). Antonis MeCaster v. Shate of Tadiana et al, Cause No, 7402-/6ll-MIaay 6, Antonio MeCaster vi State of Indiana,ebal, Cause No. IBA-MI-0074% 1. Ankoaio MeCaster v. Stabe of Tadiana, ef al, Cause No. 3) 18-cv01043 d,Mnbonio MeCasler v. State of Indiana, Cause wo. 20h80-1238 q). Antonio MeCaster v. State of Indiana, Cassse Wo. Mho2-200gPc (4 | 1). Antonio Mclaster v. State of Indiana, Cause No, AOKPe-I8Ik "HS, Rakonio MeCaster v. Ron Neal, Warden, Cause No. d: AlCV00592 12). Antonio MeCaster v. Ron Neal, Warden, Cause Wo, al-a8l7 . | TABLE _OF CONTENTS | OPINLONS BELOW... 4 JURISDICTION., a-4 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED... «= Y|