No. 21-7964

Estevan Saucedo v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-05-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: coerced-confession confession-admissibility constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-suppression exclusionary-rule law-enforcement-conduct miranda-rights police-misconduct police-tactics
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Appellant's Confession Admissible Since He Was Coerced by Illegal Police Tactics?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Was Appellant’s Confession Admiscible Simce H was bosed in illegal Police tactics? ) Would a diffecent verdict have been reached, had the iW egally | Solicited evidence wot been Considered? : ) Is the time ripe for our High Court to address the concstont Violation | includ img Petitioners, of our Fondomerta| rights Pursuant to OW Mirando rights and Congtitution which axe +00 oF ten Violated under the disguised tactics of the fomos ”Peeleing | OPerskions” and which ovr Supreme Court Justices Liv and Cuellar | 5 insist that i+ be add vessedt |

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2021-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 23, 2022)

Attorneys

Estevan Saucedo
Estevan Saucedo — Petitioner
Estevan Saucedo — Petitioner