No. 21-7965
William F. Kaetz v. United States, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitution constitutional-breach constitutional-interpretation government government-advocacy mass-tort oath-of-office social-contract totalitarianism
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it Unconstitutional and a Mass Tort to have Socialists in government advocating and supporting Totalitarianism?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1. Is it Unconstitutional and a Mass Tort to us all having Socialists in | government advocating and supporting Totalitarianism? | Page 2 of 32
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2022-05-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 23, 2022)
Attorneys
United States, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
William Kaetz
William F. Kaetz — Petitioner