No. 21-7977
Jason Albert Halda v. Wisconsin
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-resentencing criminal-sentencing disproportionality eighth-amendment juvenile-offenders juvenile-sentencing miller-montgomery-rule miller-v-alabama montgomery-v-louisiana proportionality-review sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Patent
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Patent
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Jason Halda entitled to a resentencing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 1. Is Jason Halda entitled to a resentencing because the judge imposed sentences long before : the Court’s rulings in Miller and Montgomery. Therefore, the sentencing judge could not be guided by those decisions? , 2. Does Jason Halda’s sentence involve the high probability of disproportionality because he was sentenced pre-dated this Court’s decision in Roper, Graham, Miller, and Montgomery and never received a Miller compliant sentencing hearing? : 2
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent State of Wisconsin to respond filed.
2022-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 27, 2022)
Attorneys
State of Wisconsin
Anne C Murphy — Department of Justice - Criminal Appeals Unit, Respondent
Anne C Murphy — Department of Justice - Criminal Appeals Unit, Respondent