Whether the Iqbal & Twombly fact-pleading standard applied and extended in the Ninth Circuit through the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) in Hebbe v. Pliler is legal, just, due, or prudent under PLRA, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), the Court's common law principle of stare decisis, the U.S. Constitution, or for equitable or public policy reasons?

Question Presented Is the Iqbal & Twombly fact-pleading standard applied and extended in the Ninth Circuit through the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) in Hebbe v. Pliler legal, just, due, or prudent under PLRA, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”), the Court’s common law principle of stare decisis, the U.S. Constitution, or for equitable or public policy reasons?