Whether conflict of interest existed at trial after judge gamed the withholding of evidence from the defense

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED UWhether Conflict of interes + existed at tral after dudge gamed lene w led se oF evidence Ye with beld/excluded om the defense % 2, Whether Mande was uideted in denial of the [Ssuence oF the yisk of. _ 32e(C Ineclulnation before. interregatlon ond state ment was taken gre Sedat ¢ The Sinte yacktited fhe eight ly ViclaHlen ¢ ee J yihcines fhe yolomon! oF carbecrlon was admlssa We tn courk inolelctlen of KA | randat _ a enn Ty Whather DePonce. Alferney LOhelsta phere Schverl was ineffective in nck _ bias_testimeny wa ellewed bn _couck a . Giwhether Hoe funy snes compromised by viewng the Stitement ollewed by “TWhetner sausel yarullege war videted In compelling my wie 6 ye « wih, Diy the Le os the coapelent wae sebplena and shel wes con flaed esey— bulhether the defence consplved with fhe Jefe b tn ame the. yn by use eF ae : egy @._payer_point mug shetend charger wilh euk dayectlen Reem the 3 Whelter the ju judge ached Ta conBUlE ond with bles/preiudtee In allewing __ false evidence th cout ? The yidatlon a& Mivanda 25 Ite knews the law and 4 eppllecAHens ee ne eee ane eee anne onc 10. Miranda. wos vidated because. there og no evidence cl acduen the FoFe brew It had ne case. by pursue § When at the Hue _€ wee tele! there was no eclme th the a