No. 21-7999
Kristine Arutyunyan v. Cindy Fields, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights diversity-jurisdiction diversity-of-citizenship federal-question pro-se public-importance standing supreme-court-rule
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the pro se civil lawsuit based on federal question and diversity of citizenship has merit and should be heard by the Supreme Court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. 1 petition the Supreme Court to review and reconsider the Court of Appeals for the . Second Circuit of New York decision on the legitimacy of the pro se civil lawsuit which has the basis of federal question and diversity of citizenship question. This civil case is of public importance and requires immediate determination in this Court under the United States Supreme Court Rule 10. “Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals Before Judgment (See 28 U.S.C. §2101(e)”); under expedited calendar Term. (See “
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-10-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent Cindy Fields to respond filed.
2022-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 30, 2022)
Attorneys
Cindy Fields
David J. Eiseman — Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP, Respondent
Kristine Arutyunyan
Kristiine Arutyunyan — Petitioner