Daniel Taylor v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
whether-the-failure-to-provide-a-trial-transcript-violates-due-process
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _ THE fo ct ] thas mst poevidad q transcript util ; ho Mid A¢lonles INNOCENCE -evrey WHE applitatran J submethd ond opted ts A 681 St and al ag uth tire letrer provided & te an Se ript THE co plate ca sah was asked fie sh OPEN COURT befbra the conclusion of Tell, asked flor uth more than one wetten CORRES PIND euiee to WHE CoyRT clerk, and als a Qivecf MOON ts the VIR. QUESTO NN 1g18 this @ DUE PROCESS viglatvon under Greitttin v Tinos's fro dagare) oft drerscr ipt dy firle POST COR MICTFen ; QUESTION 2 The Bact of the numerous terol vigletean concerning Hae gut Hy varditet dhe sur brs : rast . : ‘ yeey roug ht aqarns me Creal! HE COURT beye moved to HIS TRIAR #7 q ‘ be st: Key wrtoass ad icthiey On Fhe JS tord duvinng terval the : rpor ents wouclsed Fhe testimanr y | a key wuttness recantrng tee c@rtofnty off the 1D ofys ates Ty unas offaet,a, SUGEEST y ents ond a detteetry, fery initr uction. QUESTION FP 3 1S the flac} the €ourt ap pointed atorwey masa fhe mer con HON uralth atbr nay tho: thot on i BENCK COURT avd bre uncle fald a saut Ha fa m j . . veep en gthat fee CIRCUIT COURT enough oh og turHied I interest te i mug a Ni §Tice GRANT MISCARR age