No. 21-8003
Loretta Jean Alford v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-judge administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process hearing hearing-request merit-systems-protection-board standing witness witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Merit Systems Protection Board violate Petitioner's civil-rights, due-process, hearing, witness, administrative-procedure
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Did the Merit Systems Protection Board violate Petitioner's civil rights of due , process when an administrative judge failed to provide Petitioner a hearing , request with witness as requested, after not receiving any responses from the , Committee for Purchase, as held by this Court in Opp Cotton Mills v. | Administrator, 312 U.S. 216 (1941), haven't been met? : } | 2) Why has my case reached the US Supreme Court if my Case was never heard by the District or Circuit Court? | R ; } | |
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent Merit Systems Protection Board to respond filed.
2022-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 30, 2022)
Attorneys
Merit Systems Protection Board
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent