Did the indictment fail to charge an offense against the laws of the United States, because no jurisdiction has been ceded or accepted over the place where Mr. Graham's alleged criminal activity is alleged to have occurred?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ONE: DId the or indictment fail to charge an offense againse the laws ofthe United States, because no jurisdiction has been ceded or accepted over the place where Mr. Graham's alleged criminal activity is alleged to have occurred? TWO: Was the trial Court without subject-matter jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231? THREE: Did the criminal statute that Mr. Graham allegedly violated exceed the power of Congress as applied to Due Process Rights secured by the Fifth Amendment, encroach on the sovereignty and jurisdiction of the Union state of Georgia violate the Tenth Amendmant and the findamental principles of Federalism? : ~~ —_ The full text of these three grounds for challenge in the petition are © —~ contained within Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus § 2241, See