No. 21-8014
Reginald Woods v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 district-court district-court-discretion first-step-act policy-statement sentence-reduction sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 is an 'applicable' policy statement that binds a district court in considering a defendant-filed motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 is an “applicable” policy statement that binds a district court in considering a defendant-filed motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018. i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2022)
Attorneys
Reginald Woods
Allison Case — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Allison Case — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent