Did the panel of the Fifth Circuit err by deciding the merit of an appeal not properly before the Court to justify the denial of a Certificate of Appealability?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | [QUESTION ONE] Did the panel of the Fifth Circuit err by deciding the merit of an appeal not properly before the Court to justify the denial of a Certificate of Appealability ? , [QUESTION TWO]: In light of the denial of COA by the Fifth Cir ~cuit Court of Appealsbased on State's procedure bar defense[d]loes this Court have jurdicial and [pJower to determine whether Thompson [GOOD LAW], such that Taylor should be procedure barred from review of his U.S. Const. Due Process claim that the evidence is insufficient to support possession of a controlled substance ? [QUESTION THREE]: In light of the mandate in Hainer v.Kemer~and the District Court denied pro se Taylor request for COA-does this Court have jurisdiction to grant certiorari, vacate, and remand this case back to the district Court-ording it to [LIBERALLY CONSTRUED] the pleadings by reviewing Tylor's complaints for substantive merit rether than for [TECHICAL PROCEDURAL COMPLIANCE] ? [QUESTION FOUR] :Whether the District Court [ABUSED ITS DISCRETION] by denying motion for relief under Rule 60(b)(6) & (d)(3) ?, If so, does this Court have jurisdiction to grant certiorari, vacate, and remand this case back to the district court-ordering a review of Taylor's insufficient of evidence claim, in light of the fact that the district court denied the Petitioner's request for COA ? B. :