No. 21-8025
Christopher Thieme, aka John Thieme v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3664 all-writs-act criminal-law criminal-procedure illegal legal-relief restitution restitution-order sentencing sentencing-procedure statutory-interpretation writ-of-audita-querela
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 18 U.S.C. §3664(k) and (0) permit a defendant to file a motion to vacate a restitution he asserts is illegal?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2022)
Attorneys
Christopher Thieme
Christopher Thieme — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent