No. 21-8026
William F. Kaetz v. Educational Credit Management Corporation, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: bankruptcy bankruptcy-law constitutional-vagueness due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment standing statutory-interpretation takings vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-11-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the statute 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(8) void for vagueness therefore unconstitutional?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : | . ~ . . | + on. ee, nn } QUESTION Is the statute 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(8) void for vagueness therefore unconstitutional? Page 2 of 28
Docket Entries
2022-11-07
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-11
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent Trans Union, LLC to respond filed.
2022-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2022)
Attorneys
Trans Union, LLC
Camille Renee Nicodemus — Schuckit & Associates, P.C., Respondent
William Kaetz
William F. Kaetz — Petitioner