No. 21-8030
Andre Marcus Buchanan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553(a) 18-usc-3553a career-offender criminal-procedure due-process plain-error plain-error-review reasonableness sentencing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Buchanan's sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | WHETHER MR. BUCHANAN'S SENTENCE IS UNREASONABLE BECAUSE , IT IS GREATER THAN NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE GOALS OF | 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). | WHETHER PLAIN ERROR REVIEW WOULD HAVE DISCOVERED THAT | PETITIONER DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A CAREER OFFENDER. | | i
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2022)
Attorneys
Andre M. Buchanan
Andre Marcus Buchanan — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent