Whether a defendant is required to show a reasonable likelihood of a different outcome at trial to establish prejudice from ineffective assistance of counsel

No question identified. : | Qvestins freceted the coud of Apperls ened bY yeling Ha A 714| Suebse iy ro} feguied To gre A reyvass Lasheetion of He lesser atinse of cfiakal nesluet Lomicide ube An Lade}ne Allesed mutter father Han Febry murder. > The cork of Apres efted ia relins Ht The mens Ale, Pot inpions were properly limited Je he 7Abre of He Gndet . GB A Tia Dedse ened by of ganis A nishis| uber 4 Sulor Ame ferwsid Wee vs itt. Drtellacty qrial 9347s She commited fPersely vader opts LY woskias uit, the Diswice Obbmerr wite 4+ MeHodied Hesp44!. @ Arve At He Hoe of Vial were Welfectie for He fact cot presendrs Mo wihessts On He Appellant beraif yt (ow d of gave A ssuy A dtHee) verdieh Failure fo Fakiev wihesses OF distever (adil) Aenilade etidonce ts An EF7Or Movie © flefarksion net Trial sh Atesy. She Trial codse + The Hororable Sid Hale Z2bh qodicat Distict Covtt , heer Comty , TEXAS. Covasel tor fhe State of Texas 4+ Tria) pnd on SHA Appeal | Enrico VAIDer 101 west Muay SAN Batons TA 78S Todd Heasle Jo) West Mery S4n Arbaio TY PES —soslun Ssmoig Jo) Wes} Mees San Mnprio TK 7520 Covrse| Or the Ate of Texas on this Aires! Casey Leish Saciesn Solomon Acsishay Airey General Austin Texgs the Hono sable orlando Garcia Uaikd See Distic} Court tr He weslen Disyr} of texas, Mn Arprio Divison. velAkd ses Cook V stile Be4 Sw.2d YRS CTee Om AP 1994) Alam V Mle be SS 2d IST CT C40 1984) Ache v she 721 S™. 23345 CTX C. Aiy [95t) a | |