Whether an unaddressed Constitutional claim not affirmatively contradicted by the record deserves review, and if so, should review under Due Process Clause guarantee an evidentiary hearing?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether an unaddressed Consbtubenal clam not allirmatwely contradrebed lay he Cecord doserves reset , and if 30, should review yndar Due process clause guarantee an evidentiary hearin g 7% . 2, whether Pre now properly inberpathed elements of $422 5) and #424 GSC) as Clari fred yx Reha! require covreckian under Due process because Pehtoners exercised tight to a Cae tera wes deprived by | the governm onts long~ Shand ing msin ber prehahen of as berden to prave fens fea to all vlementy beyond a (eayonable dovrot , violates beth the Ste amendment Due process and GM amendment right to a Car tral ? 3. whether the vagueness doclrne . antends to the 13 USCS g 424 OY EAYs lan guage of “im Podnerance of") as tt Pails +e ive nolice of what slement ov conduct 1S cequred to violate Me Shalt | vielates Due process? vill