No. 21-8046

Joseph Martin Danks v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-06-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: capital-punishment criminal-culpability cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment inmate-rights mental-health state-liability state-responsibility
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Eighth Amendment preclude the execution of a seriously mentally ill inmate whose homicidal behavior was the reasonably known, foreseeable, and preventable product of his illness and the direct result of the State's failure, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, to provide him with minimally adequate mental health care that was necessary to control his behavior?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the Eighth Amendment preclude the execution of a seriously mentally ill inmate whose homicidal behavior was the reasonably known, foreseeable, and preventable product of his illness and the direct result of the State’s failure, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, to provide him with minimally adequate mental health care that was necessary to control his behavior? 2. Consistent with Johnson v. United States, 544 U.S. 295, 296 (2005), is this Court’s holding in Brown v. Plata, 563 U.S. 493, 532 (2011), a “fact” that must be considered by a state court in fairly and accurately assessing whether the State violated rights secured by the Eighth Amendment?

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-09-01
Reply of petitioner Joseph Danks filed.
2022-08-19
Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
2022-08-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 24, 2022.
2022-07-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 4, 2022 to August 24, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-06-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 4, 2022.
2022-06-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2022 to August 4, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-03-17
Application (21A518) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 4, 2022.
2022-03-14
Application (21A518) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 5, 2022 to June 4, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2022-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2022)

Attorneys

Joseph Martins Danks
Gary D. SowardsHabeas Corpus Resource Center, Petitioner
Ronald Broomfield
Justain P. RileyCA Dept. of Justice: Office of the AG, Respondent