Is Nevada Supreme Court Rule 36 allowing appellate decisions to be unpublished and unable to the cited as precedent a violation of the rule of stare decisis and of the common law?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1. Is Nevada Supreme Court Rule 36 allowing appellate decisions to be unpublished and unable to the cited as precedent a violation of the rule of stare decisis and of the common law? 2. Is the miscitation and sophism used in the : dismissal for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief may be based in the case of Norberg v. Nevada Center for Dermatology, Vazeen and Casse a paradigm of why appellate court cases need to be published and cited as precedent? y ii : LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Supreme Court of the State of Nevada ; Case No.: 82083 Douglas Norberg v. Nevada Center for Dermatology, ; Ashley Vazeen and Dr. Billie Casse Date of Opinion: September 24, 2021 Court of Appeals of the State of Nevada . Case No.: 82083-COA ; Douglas Norberg v. Nevada Center for Dermatology, : Ashley Vazeen and Dr. Billie Casse Date of Final Order: July 16, 2021 Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Case No.: CV20-01218 Douglas Norberg v. Nevada Center for Dermatology, Ashley Vazeen and Dr. Billie Casse Date of Final Order: October 20, 2020 \