Has the action by the Court af Criminal Appeals of Texas in dismissing Petitioners State Application for Habeas Corpus Violated Article I, Section A, Clause 2, of the United States Constitution, where being denied the right to seek habeas relief?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Has the action by the Court af Criminal Appeals of Texas in dismissing Petitioners State Application for | 3 Unt 6 Habexs Corpus Violated Article I, Section A, Clause 2, of the United States Constitution, uthere deing 30. has efRtively denied him the right to seek hubeas relle?? Uihere he had presented evidence of newly discovered Pacts that met the veguirements of Artide 11.07, 84@) GL the Texas Gode oP Criming) Procedure, and Me Ouiggan Ve Perkins, 544 U.S, 383 (2013), has the Court o€ Criminal Appeals action violated Vedera| [nw as eetabl ished by the Supreme Court of the United States, by determing it did not quality a5 "newly discovered evidence." Does petitioners "Newly discovered ucts" meet the — Peguirenents oP Article \LO7 $4 (2) end @)o? the Texzs Code of Criminel Prucedure, end MeQuiggun v. Perkins?" Is the actions of the State courts 4 "state created impediment" preventing petitioner fom seeking habews relieP in | the State end Federal courts ?