No. 21-8063

William Lee Wright Jr. v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-06-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process faretta faretta-motion judicial-discretion self-representation timeliness totality-of-the-circumstances
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a pre-trial request for self-representation under Faretta v. California is timely

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether, as the majority of jurisdictions hold, a request for selfrepresentation under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), is timely if made prior to trial, or whether instead, as California and a handful of other jurisdictions maintain, even a pre-trial Faretta request can be held to be “untimely” based on a “totality of the circumstances” test? ii RELATED CASES e People v. William Lee Wright, Jr., No. KA048285-01, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, Judgment entered June 14, 2002 e People v. William Lee Wright, Jr., No. S107900, Supreme Court of California. Judgment entered December 16, 2021; modified on denial of rehearing March 9, 2022 iii

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-22
Reply of petitioner William Lee Wright, Jr. filed. (Distributed)
2022-09-06
Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
2022-07-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 6, 2022.
2022-07-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 5, 2022 to September 6, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-06-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2022.
2022-06-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 6, 2022 to August 5, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-06-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2022)

Attorneys

California
Stephanie Chu SantoroCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent
Dana Muhammad AliCalifornia Dept. of Justice, Office of the Attorne, Respondent
William Lee Wright, Jr.
Alyssa Christine MellottOffice of the State Public Defender, Petitioner