No. 21-8067

Juan Gomez v. Scott Frauenheim, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: child-sexual-abuse criminal-procedure culpability due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel intellectual-disability sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated when his trial counsel failed to investigate and present evidence of the petitioner's intellectual disability and its impact on his culpability

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : in an unpublished order. App. 18. JURISDICTION The final judgment of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was entered on March 15, 2022. App. 1. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS INVOLVED Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides in pertinent part: “No state shall... deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law.” The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, in pertinent part, that “in all criminal prosecutions” the defendant shall have the right to the assistance of counsel.”

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Juan Gomez
Stephanie AdraktasLaw Office of Stephanie Ardraktas, Petitioner