No. 21-807
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review civil-procedure court-jurisdiction disqualified-judge due-process judicial-disqualification judicial-procedure retroactive-disqualification standing writ-of-mandate
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Securities
DueProcess FourthAmendment Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the California Supreme Court should be directed to order appellate review of Petitioner's appeal before a court of appeal having jurisdiction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: 1. Whether the California Supreme Court should be directed to order appellate review of Petitioner’s appeal before a court of appeal having jurisdiction when: (a) A disqualified judge’s participation tainted the adjudicative process of the three-judge appellate panel in Petitioner’s case? (b) The California Supreme Court denied Petitioner’s writ of mandate to vacate the decision by a two-judge appellate panel lacking state constitutional jurisdiction to adjudicate an appeal on the basis that the third required judge had been retroactively disqualified by California?
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-11-24
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Amelia Eng
Hamid Joseph Nourmand — Law Offices of H. Joseph Nourmand, APC, Petitioner
Hamid Joseph Nourmand — Law Offices of H. Joseph Nourmand, APC, Petitioner