(1) Can a criminal defendant maintain an appeal of the revocation of her pro se status by a district court judge sua sponte during the sentencing phase, or if a non-appealable order, must the Court of Appeals be the Ninth Circuit to decide this exact issue? See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 ("The court of appeals from all ... appeals ... shall have jurisdiction of ... appeals ... Aspba If Corp. v. United States 4 84 U.S TRo- 6I'dS^iX&tabng "that, in C-ri mt n*» CflSCS , the final ity U(JUl«:m,cnf aeneretUy "prohibits appcll^4e review until after conviohon and impositVn of SCnbnce y; Flanagja.m r. United States x 4(bi5 U.S>. 2J54 } 2. TO f I 4 84-) £statin^, in a Case ini which a+ndl courV cnfcrcd am order dis^udf-C,,,^ counsel fvr>m parVici.pation in an adion , -Hnat "Csf]uch un order "feiils, to satisfy -the s+vinacrit Conditions tor Qualification ae> cun inn mediately appealable collateral order, and -the pvorr-tdina policies ^aamsi 7 inter-locu-fory review m criminal wsei aippty in^=futrj)j United -States v. ^Oimco -OoWogj , SS4 F. 2>d S&C*. C 4tb Cih lOO^^sinbna ,+^4, to be dppsnlablo Under- Vne collateral order dodrrnc. an order- ' rn U&-V "'£|) Conclusively determine +hc disputed c^ we&tion , i i) resolve an impjrfad issue Completely Sc pe mate from the tnenbot the action , and (-5) be effectively unrei/icwable on appeal -from a final ^jwdamen+ '"^cjuotina Will v. IfaUoek | 54<g W &. 34s(d4^ Cioofe))?

(2) Is Vhe United States CocmV ot Appeals -for- Vine frJm-Vh Circai-V decision that revocation o V a enmmaI defendants pro SO status dunng Vine Sentencing pWase- not an lmmedictVely appe<a|<a ble order , 05 the divcsfiVurc rule ) Wie Vneil court's* jurisdiction is nof impacted «nd Vbe atchon moy proceed cts if no no-hce of <appe<c»| Inds been fi led by -formerly pro Se criminal defoidant ; correef ?

Can a criminal defendant immediately appeal the revocation of her pro se status by a district court judge sua sponte during the trial?